Training, inference and user interface for guiding the caching of media content on local stores

ABSTRACT

The present invention is related to a system and method of caching data employing probabilistic predictive techniques. The system and method provides local storage of a subset of available viewing selections by assigning a value to a selection and retaining selections in the cache depending on the value and size of the selection. The value assigned to an item can represent the time-dependent likelihood that a user will review an item at some time in the future. An initial value of an item can be based on the user&#39;s viewing habits, the user&#39;s viewing habit over particular time segment and/or viewing habits of a group of user&#39;s during a particular time segment. A value assigned to a selection dynamically changes according to a set of cache retention policies, where the value can be time-dependent functions that decay based on the class of the item, as determined by inference about the class or via a label associated with the item.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/825,800, filed on Apr. 4, 2001 and entitled “TRAINING, INFERENCE ANDUSER INTERFACE FOR GUIDING THE CACHING OF MEDIA CONTENT ON LOCALSTORES,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to information retrieval and processing,and more particularly to a system and method for storing selectedinformation in a local storage system as a function of a user's previousreviewing habits over different time intervals.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Recently, there has been an increasing trend of the amount ofinformation available on any given subject matter due to theinterconnection of computer via networks (e.g., the Internet) and theincreased availability of inexpensive data storage. In many situationspeople attempting to retrieve information on a subject area areoverwhelmed with a vast amount of information. Data that is desiredbecomes difficult to locate amongst the vast amount of informationpresented to a user. Various known information retrieval systems haveevolved that attempt to avoid the problem of information overload byperforming a ranking or prioritization of information. These systemsattempt to retrieve and provide information based on an approximation ofhow useful, interesting, and/or responsive the information is likely tobe to a system user.

For example, many systems provide search engines, which search databasecontents or “web sites” according to terms provided by a user query.However, limitations of search heuristics often cause irrelevant contentto be returned in response to a query. Furthermore, the vast wealth ofavailable information makes it difficult to separate irrelevant contentfrom relevant content. Other systems organize content based on ahierarchy of categories. These systems suffer from the fact a user mayselect a category to navigate through and determine that the content ofthe category is of no interest to the user. The user must then backtrackthrough one or more of the hierarchical categories to return to theavailable categories. The user will have to continue this process untilthe user locates the desired information.

In view of the shortcomings of the systems discussed above,probabilistic predictive models have been developed. Collaborativefiltering systems are one particular type of predictive probabilisticpredictive model. Collaborative filtering systems predict preferences ofa user based on known attributes of the user, as well as knownattributes of other users. For example, a preference of a user may bewhether they would like to watch a particular television show, while anattribute of the user may include their age, gender and income. Inaddition, the attributes can contain one or more of the user's knownpreferences, such as the user's dislikes of certain other shows. Auser's preference can also be predicted based on the similarity of thatuser's attributes to other users. Typically, attributes are providednumerical values (e.g., a vote) and a weighted sum of the attributevalues are utilized to determine a preference. Additionally, correlationcomputations are employed for a given user and other users to predictthe preference of a user for a particular selection. Some collaborativefiltering systems employ clustering algorithms to determine users whosepreferences seem to be similar.

Collaborative filtering systems have been determined to be relativelysuccessful in selecting desirable preferences of a user given adequateattributes of the user. However, in certain circumstances a singlesystem may be employed that is utilized by multiple users all havingdifferent attributes and preferences. For example, a single householdmay all share a single computer or a single television device. In thesecircumstance, there is no way for a collaborative filtering system todetermine which of the household members is utilizing the system at anygiven time without the member identifying themselves.

In today's world of complex media offerings and time-shifted viewing ofstreamed content, potentially at lower than real-time rates from sourcessuch as satellites there is an unmet need for assisting users in cachingcontent onto local stores that they are most interested in reviewing.For example, some services offer users upwards of 500 programs to selectamongst. Such offerings also provide a large hard disc for local cachingof content. However, even these large hard discs have a limited amountof storage for caching content locally.

Accordingly, there is an unmet need in the art for providingprobabilistic predictive techniques to an information retrieval systemand a local storage system that can be employed on a shared device.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to a system and method of caching dataguided by a probabilistic predictive model, such as collaborativefiltering models and other statistical models that can be used to inferthe likelihood of a user's preferences for content. The system andmethod have particular application to multimedia systems for providingstorage of a subset of available viewing selections by assigning a valueor utility to a selection and retaining selections in the cachedepending on the value and size of a selection. An initial value of anitem can be based on the user's viewing habits, the user's viewing habitover particular time segment (e.g., early morning, late morning, earlyafternoon, late afternoon, primetime, late night) and/or viewing habitsof a group of user's during a particular time segment.

A value assigned to a selection dynamically changes according to a setof cache retention policies. For example, a selection's value may bereduced as the selection ages because a user is less likely to view theselection over time. Additionally, the value of a selection may changebased on changes on a user's viewing habits, changes in time segments ora user's modification of the predefined rules or policies. Such policiescan be sensitive to the class of content cached. For example, the valueof news broadcasts may decay more quickly with the age of the content,in comparison to documentary material covering a topic area that a userhas conveyed an interest. In one aspect of the invention, autility-directed knapsack analysis is continuously performed to storenewly available content into available memory, based on theconsideration of the “expected value density” of the content, which isdefined as the ratio of the value assigned to some media content and thememory cost of storing the content based on the size of the content.

Another aspect of the invention relates to the situation where allavailable memory becomes totally committed. In this event, newlyavailable content overwrites previously stored content when the expectedvalue density of the new content exceeds the expected value density ofolder content. The expected utility of maintaining content in memory canbe determined by the ratio of the current utility as a function of theage of the item, based on the policy that is active for the particularitem. The value of content stored in cache decays based on the class ortype of content, in accordance with a time-dependent utility model, forexample, utility becomes a function of initial utility, age and contentclass. Thus, the expected value density of content stored in memory isthe ratio of the size of the object and the current utility of theobject as determined by the time-dependent utility model.

In one aspect of the invention, the initial value of content is theprobability that the user will review the content and the change in thelikelihood that the user will review content with the time that it hasbeen stored in memory without review. Such a probability can be taken asindicated by a score provided by an inferential model of a user'spreference, such as the score assigned by a collaborative filteringmodel. The collaborative filtering model can be enhanced with popularityfiltering. In another approach, a time-centric collaborative filteringmodel can be employed.

Another aspect of the invention relates to providing a separate storagearea and policies for selections that are cached for use approximatelyin real time. For example, the invention solves the problem of thesituation where a user has missed the commencement of a broadcastbecause of tardiness based on transportation or meeting delays. In sucha situation, a broadcast television show is already in progress when theuser comes available in an appropriate place to review the televisioncontent. The present invention provides for the storage of N number ofselections based on predictions of selections a viewer is most likelygoing to watch at any given moment and begins recording those shows intoa cache at the beginning of the program. In the event that the viewerturns on a selection of one of the N selections of interest, theremaining non-selected selections are removed from the separate storagearea. In the event that none of the selections are selected, theselections age quickly and are removed from the separate storage area sothat new selections in a new time period may be stored. Alternatively,the selections may be stored in the general storage area with a valuedecay that is quicker than other selections based on the nature of thecontent and/or the associated value assigned to the content.

Another aspect of the invention relates to a system and method forstoring portions of data of selections in cache if the selections havedata viewing rates that are faster than the rate the data can bereceived from a source that makes the content available on demand. Oncea selection is made and viewing begins, the amount of data in the cacheis always maintained such that viewing is not interrupted. In suchcases, speculative recording of television content based on expectedvalue density can store content at lower cost, as the complete contentdoes not have to be stored. Rather an amount of content that ideallybuffers the content for real-time viewing can be stored. Such bufferingof content effectively raises the value density of content that can beaccessed as the ratio of value to cost is greater.

To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the inventionthen, comprises the features hereinafter described and particularlypointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexeddrawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of theinvention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of thevarious ways in which the principles of the invention may be employedand the present invention is intended to include all such aspects andtheir equivalents. Other objects, advantages and novel features of theinvention will become apparent from the following detailed descriptionof the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a system utilizing an inferencesystem in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an inference system being employedin a multimedia system in accordance with one aspect of the presentinvention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a local storage system inaccordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of a local storage system inaccordance with another aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of an inference system being employedin a program delivery system including a memory storage system forrecording live shows in accordance with one aspect of the presentinvention.

FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of a possible user interface of anelectronic program guide in accordance with one aspect of the presentinvention.

FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of a program delivery system residingon a server coupled to a set top box having secondary storage system inaccordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a secondary memory system forproviding real time viewing of non-live shows in accordance with oneaspect of the present invention.

FIG. 9 illustrates a flow diagram of a methodology for providing rankedrecommendations of titles of information to a memory loading system inaccordance with one aspect of the invention.

FIG. 10 illustrates a flow diagram of a methodology for storing programinformation in a local storage system in accordance with one aspect ofthe invention.

FIG. 11 illustrates a flow diagram for providing real time viewing ofnon-live shows in accordance with one aspect of the invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a block diagram of a computer system in accordancewith an environment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to a system and method of caching dataguided by a probabilistic predictive model, such as collaborativefiltering models and other statistical models that can be used to inferthe likelihood of a user's preferences for content. The system andmethod have particular application to multimedia systems for providingstorage of a subset of available viewing selections by assigning a valueor utility to a selection and retaining selections in the cachedepending on the value and size of a selection. An initial value of anitem can be based on the user's viewing habits, the user's viewing habitover particular time segment (e.g., early morning, late morning, earlyafternoon, late afternoon, primetime, late night) and/or viewing habitsof a group of user's during a particular time segment.

The present invention has particularly useful application to multimediasystems where viewing content is time shifted at lower than real-timerates from media delivery systems (e.g., satellite systems). The presentinvention provides a system and method for determining recommendationsof media selections of system users most likely to be watched by asystem user and employing these recommendations to store (e.g., cache)information locally corresponding to the recommendations. The storing ofthe information is determined by inferences, by employing probabilisticpredictive models, such as collaborative filtering techniques, based onthe time interval or time segment of previously viewed selections. Theprobabilistic predictive techniques of the present invention allow forthe system to predict the likelihood that a user will prefer a programregardless of the user's genre by evaluating the time interval ofpreviously viewed information for a corresponding system.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a system 10 utilizing an inferencesystem 18 employing probabilistic predictive model techniques, such ascollaborative filtering techniques or other statistical model techniquesthat can be used to infer the likelihood of a user's preferences forcontent. The inference system 18 infers preferences of user's of thesystem and provides values to items for caching in a local storagesystem 27. In the present example, the inference system 18 ranks itemsor selections based on viewing habits of users of the system 10 inaddition to considering time segments or intervals of those viewinghabits. It is to be appreciated that various inference techniques may beemployed to carry out the present invention (e.g., correlationtechniques, Bayesian machine learning, statistical decision trees,etc.). In a training mode, the inference system 18 utilizes selectionsof previously viewed information that is logged in a user's database 12and selections of previously viewed information that is logged indatabases 16 of other shared systems. It is to be appreciated that thedatabase information may be stored locally at the system 10, remotely ata remote server or the like (e.g., in a single database) or across anumber of servers. Additionally, the inference system 18 may residelocally at the system 10, remotely at a remote server or across a numberof servers. The inference system 18 is trained by examining selectionsreviewed by a large pool of users for more than a threshold amount oftime. Negative votes are also considered by monitoring selections jumpedaway from after being reviewed briefly. Temporal filtering can then beemployed to provide a reviewed item list and a recommendation list for aparticular time segment.

Title selections are time stamped with different time segments by eventtype (e.g., title) and class type (e.g., news, documentary, sportsevents, etc.). The log data is annotated with distinctions about thetime of the day that a system user has viewed the information. Forexample, a day can be segmented into early morning, mid-morning,afternoon, late afternoon, early evening, evening, late night.Additional segments can include information that is viewed on weekdaysverse weekends. Furthermore, non-weekdays can be further subdivided intoSaturday, Sunday and holidays. Elements from a dataset are consideredtagged with these time segments or intervals and trained with this dataemploying conventional collaborative filtering techniques. Variousprobabilistic predictive model techniques may be employed to carry outthe present invention (e.g., correlation techniques, Bayesian machinelearning, probability tree networks, etc.).

In real-time, appropriate information or evidence about a user'spreferences is inputted into the inference system 18. Evidences ofpreferences include information from previously selected informationfrom the database 12, other attributes of the shared system 14 andexplicit input of samples of preferred items by the user through a userinterface 22. Evidence of the users preference is largely gathered byimplicit evidence of items that are liked or disliked by monitoring theuser's activity. A positive vote is given to an item that the userdwells over for a threshold period of time, while negative votes aregiven to items that are briefly reviewed and jumped away from for reviewof other content. Furthermore, a user via the user interface 22 mayselect an item for a positive or negative vote. For example, in a firstiteration a user may be presented with a list of reviewed items for aselected time period. A user may then select amongst a variety offiltering components residing in a filtering system 20. Additionally,the user may select or provide positive or negative votes for items. Themodified or filtered reviewed item list may then be inputted into theinference system 18 as further evidence of user preferences.

The inference system 18 can then provide a recommendation list of itemsranked by preference values to the local storage system 27. The localstorage system 27 then stores or records items that have the highestvalues. Items can be assigned higher values based on the likelihood thata user would like to view that item. Furthermore, values of items can beaged out based on a cache retention policy. Such policies can besensitive to the class of content cached. For example, the value of newsbroadcasts may decay more quickly with the age of the content, incomparison to documentary material covering a topic area that a user hasconveyed an interest. In one aspect of the invention, a utility-directedknapsack analysis is continuously performed to store newly availablecontent into available memory, based on the consideration of the“expected value density” of the content, which is defined as the ratioof the value assigned to some media content and the memory cost ofstoring the content based on the size of the content.

The inference system 18 ranks selections based on viewing habits ofusers of the system 10 in addition to being able to consider timesegments or intervals of those viewing habits. The inference system 18considers the temporal history of the content viewed by users of thesystem (e.g., a multi-user system) and dates the list of availableinformation 28 (e.g., available media) that will be made available by aninformation delivery system 26. The inference system 18 scores activeuser events for every title stored in the database 12. The inferencesystem 18 then provides a reviewed items list and a rankedrecommendation list based on a requested time period to the userinterface 22 via the filtering system 20. The ranked recommendation listcontains recommendations of selectable titles within the time periodrequested from a particular time segment via the user interface 22. Theinference system 18 provides the ranked set of titles that may be ofinterest to a system user based on similar titles that the users of thesystem have historically viewed in that time segment. The filteringsystem 20 includes various filters for adding, deleting or modifying thereviewed items list (e.g., assigning positive or negative votes toitems) and inputting the new evidence of preferences into the inferencesystem 18 for updating of the reviewed items list and the rankedselectable information list. For example, a popularity filter may beemployed to provide shows of interest that users of the system are notlikely to know about. Furthermore, text descriptions of items may beadded to the reviewed item list employing a search engine or the like.The new preferences may be inputted into the inference system 18 and anew recommendation list generated.

Once a selection of a title to view is made by a user via the userinterface 22, a request is transmitted to the information deliverysystem 26, which transmits the requested information corresponding tothe selected title to a viewer 24. The viewed information can betransmitted from the local storage system 27 (e.g., a local hard drive)or directly from the remote information system 25. Alternatively, aportion of the information can be stored in the local storage system 27and transmitted to the viewer 24, while the remaining information istransmitted to the local storage system 27 from the remote informationsystem 25, until the entire contents of the selected information hasbeen viewed.

The viewed information is then transmitted back to the previously viewedinformation database 12 for logging and for providing the viewed titleand time segment information to the inference system 18 for furthertraining of the inference system 18. This ensures that the inferencesystem 18 is continuously and automatically being updated with thelatest viewing information. A system user may also select information tobe recorded via the user interface 22 to the local storage system 27,which is then recorded for later viewing, or for viewing when data isviewed at a faster rate than it can be transmitted from the remoteinformation system 25.

Although, the inference system 18 is described with respect to a singleprobabilistic model, a plurality of time interval models can be trainedand employed utilizing selections of previously viewed information overa respective time interval. Furthermore, the inference system 18 canemploy a single probabilistic model in which previously viewedinformation is provided with a time stamp according to event occurrencefor each time interval or segment. In other words, a title beingselected within two different time intervals is treated as differentevent occurrences, such that training is performed as if the eventoccurrence has occurred with a totally different title.

It is to be appreciated that the present invention is particularlysuited for providing selected titles of television programs or othermultimedia to be stored locally in a local cache of a set top box or thelike. In this type of application, multiple members or users in a familyutilizing a single television system make it improbable to determinepreferences for any particular member of the family. Therefore, thepresent system and method are ideally suited for this applicationbecause household viewing habits are typically consistent at differenttimes of a day for weekdays, weekends and holidays. For example,children may watch children shows early Saturday mornings, while adultsmay watch different types of shows at different time periods, forexample, soap operas at mid-afternoon, sports on weekends, news at nightand more adult oriented shows late at night. The probabilisticprediction models of the present invention apply time segmenting to alocal caching system for determining probable program selections basedon the temporal history of media viewing habits in a household.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of multimedia system 30 utilizing aninference system 38 employing probability predictive model techniques,such as time based collaborative filtering techniques. The inferencesystem 38 ranks selections based on viewing habits of users of thesystem 30 in addition to considering time segments or intervals of thoseviewing habits. Various probabilistic predictive model techniques may beemployed to carry out the present invention with respect to anapplication of a multimedia system. The inference system 38 receivestitles of previous viewed programs that are logged in a database 32.Each title is time stamped with different time segments and thepercentage of the complete program that the user has watched is loggedin the database 32. The log data is annotated with distinctions aboutthe time of the day that a system user has watched the televisionprogram.

As previously mentioned, a day can be segmented into early morning,mid-morning, afternoon, late afternoon, early evening, evening, latenight. Additional segments can include information that is viewed onweekdays verse weekends. Furthermore, non-weekdays can be furthersubdivided into Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Elements from a datasetare considered tagged with these time segments or intervals and trainedwith this data. The inference system 38 considers the temporal historyof the programs viewed by users of the system (e.g., family members of ahousehold) and dates and times of electronic program guide data 48 ofavailable programs that can be made available by a program deliverysystem 46. The inference system 38 scores active user viewing for everytitle stored in the database 32.

In a training mode, the inference system 38 utilizes selections ofpreviously viewed programs that are logged in a user's database 32 andselections of previously viewed programs that are logged in databases 36of other shared systems. It is to be appreciated that the databaseinformation may be stored locally at the system 30, remotely at a remoteserver or the like (e.g., in a single database) or across a number ofservers. Additionally, the inference system 38 may reside locally at thesystem 30, remotely at a remote server or across a number of servers.The inference system 38 is trained by examining selection reviewed by alarge pool of users for more than a threshold amount of time. Negativevotes are also considered by monitoring selections jumped away fromafter being reviewed briefly. In real-time, appropriate information orevidence about a user's preferences is inputted into the inferencesystem 38. Evidences of preferences include information about previouslyselected programs from the database 32, other attributes of the sharedsystem 34 and explicit input of samples of preferred items by the userthrough a user interface 42. Evidence of the users preference is largelygathered by implicit evidence of items that are liked or disliked bymonitoring the user's activity. Temporal filtering can then be employedto provide a reviewed item list and a recommendation list for aparticular time segment.

Furthermore, a user via the user interface 42 may select an item for apositive or negative vote. For example, in a first iteration a user maybe presented with a list of reviewed items for a selected time period. Auser may then select amongst a variety of filtering components residingin a filtering system 40. Additionally, the user may select or providepositive or negative votes for items. The modified or filtered revieweditem list may then be inputted into the inference system 38 as furtherevidence of user preferences.

The inference system 38 can then provide a recommendation list ofprograms ranked by preference values to a local cache system 47. Thelocal cache system 47 then stores or records items that have the highestvalues. Items can be assigned higher values based on the likelihood thata user would like to view that particular program. Furthermore, valuesof programs can be aged out based on a cache retention policy. Suchpolicies can be sensitive to the class of content cached. For example,the value of news broadcasts may decay more quickly with the age of thecontent, in comparison to documentary material covering a topic areathat a user has conveyed an interest. In one aspect of the invention, autility-directed knapsack analysis is continuously performed to storenewly available content into available memory, based on theconsideration of the “expected value density” of the content, which isdefined as the ratio of the value assigned to some media content and thememory cost of storing the content based on the size of the content.

The output provided to the user at a user interface 42 is a personalizedprogram guide for upcoming broadcasted media (e.g., a view of thecontent in the next hour or next several hours that is sorted byinferred user preferences). The user interface 42 allows a user toselect the most desirable shows for later automated caching of contentor give the system a go ahead for automated policies for downloadingfuture television content that seek to maximize the value of a localcache system 47. Additionally, the filtering system 40 is provided withvarious filters, such that the reviewed items list may be reduced orre-ranked based on a user's input at the user interface 42.

The recommendation list is also provided to the local cache system 47residing in a program delivery system 46. The local cache system 47utilizes the recommendation list to determine programs to store to thelocal cache system 47 that a user of the system is most likelyinterested in viewing. The programs are delivered from a remote programsource system 45, which also provides the inference system 38 withelectronic program guide data 48. Alternatively, the inference system 38can be directly linked to the local cache system 47 to provide the localcache system 47 with inferences of selectable programs that would bepreferred by a system user based on previously viewed information byuser's of the system 30 during a time interval of the time period beingstored.

The user interface 42 allows a user the ability to select a program forviewing and/or recording. Once a selection of a title to view is made bya user via the user interface 42, a request is transmitted to theprogram delivery system 46 by the filtering system 30. The programdelivery system 46 transmits the requested program corresponding to theselected title to a viewer 44. Information about the viewed program isthen transmitted back to the previously viewed programs database 32 forlogging and for providing the viewed information to the inference system38 for further training of the inference system 38. A system user mayalso select programs to be recorded via the user interface component 42to the local cache system 47, which is then recorded for later viewingor for viewing when data is viewed at a faster rate than it can betransmitted from the remote program source system 45.

FIG. 3 illustrates a block schematic diagram of a local cache system 50in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. The local cachesystem 50 includes a cache loading system 52 operable to receiveinferences from an inferences system 51, such as recommendation rankedby preference value, and/or direct instructions to record specificprogram titles from a filtering system 55 via the user interface 53.Once the cache loading system 52 receives inferences and/or instructionsfor recording program selections, the cache loading system 52 requestsprogram information from the remote program source system 57 and storesthis information in a memory system 58 employing a utility system 54.The memory system 58 can be a hard drive residing on a television settop box, a faster memory (e.g., a RAM) or a combination of a hard drivewhich transfers information to a faster memory when a program isselected.

The utility system 54 employs a cache retention policy component 56 foraging out selection over time. A value assigned to a selectiondynamically changes according to a set of cache retention policies. Forexample, a selection's value may be reduced as the selection agesbecause a user is less likely to view the selection over time.Additionally, the value of a selection changes based on changes on auser's viewing habits, changes in time segments or a user's modificationof the predefined rules or policies. Such policies can be sensitive tothe class of content cached. In one aspect of the invention, the utilitysystem 54 continuously performs a utility-directed knapsack analysis tostore newly available content into available memory, based on theconsideration of the “expected value density” of the content, which isdefined as the ratio of the value assigned to some media content and thememory cost of storing the content based on the size of the content.

The memory system 58 includes a first portion or user define cacheportion 60, a second portion or live show selections portion 62 and athird portion or general selections portion 64. The user defined cacheportion 60 stores user selected programs for recording. The live showselections portion 62 contains stored information relating to programsthat are currently in process that a user may want to catch from thebeginning based on previous viewing habits with the current timeinterval. The general selections portion 64 is the portion of memorywhere general programs are recorded based on the likelihood that asystem user would like to watch these programs. The general programs arerecommended by the inference system 51 to record for later viewing of asystem user based on previous viewing habits within the current timeinterval. The user defined cache portion 60 includes selections S1-S3,the live show selections portion 62 includes selections S4-S7 and thegeneral selections portion 64 contains selections S8-S16. The selectionsS1-S16 include programs of various time periods and sizes.

The cache loading system 52 employs a bin packing methodology to storeinferred program selection information in the memory system 58. The binpacking methodology of the present invention determines a sorting valueof the selection by taking the inferred value of the selection dividedby the size of the selection. The bin packing methodology then sorts theprogram selections in the general selections portion 64 of the memorysystem 58 from the highest sorting value to the lowest sorting value.The bin packing methodology (hereinafter referred to as “the valuedensity method for bin packing”) ranks program information based on theprobability a user will most likely want to view a program at aspecified time period within a time interval for which the inferencesystem 51 was trained.

The local cache system 50 includes the utility system 54, which monitorsthe memory system 58 through information stored in the cache loadingsystem 52. The utility system 54 monitors the program selectioninformation residing in the memory system 58 and utilizes the cacheretention policy to age out the program selection information residingin the memory system 58. For example, the utility system 54 receivesprogram loading information from the cache loading system 52 includinginitial value and size information. The utility system 54 keeps track ofthe selections and value density programs in the memory system 58 andthen periodically reassigns values to the program selections using thecache retention policy component 56. The utility system 54 thentransfers this information to the cache loading system 52 which thenrearranges the programs in the memory system 58 based on the new values.The cache retention policy component 56 can include different cacheretention policies for different classes of programs. For example, newsprograms and live show programs can be aged out more rapidly thandocumentaries or movies. Additionally, new program selection informationis periodically received by the cache loading system 52, which alsobecomes part of the program selection set of the programs already storedin the memory system 58.

In one aspect of the invention, the available memory in the generalselections portion 64 becomes totally committed. In this event, newlyavailable content overwrites previously stored content when the expectedvalue density of the new content exceeds the expected value density ofolder content. As a programs value is reduced, it eventually becomesaged out by new programs with higher values since there is only a fixedamount of memory available. For example, after a program has resided inmemory for a few days, it is highly unlikely that a system user willwatch this program. Therefore, the value of the program is reduced basedon the cache retention policies residing in the cache retention policycomponent 56. It is to be appreciated that the cache retention policycomponent 56 may be customized for the system or programmable by a uservia the user interface 53. Alternatively, the cache retention policiesresiding in the cache retention policy component 56 may be based on avalue density aging model. The cache retention policies residing in thecache retention policy component 56 may be based on a separate modelutilizing historical information of viewing habits of recordedinformation in general or over specific time intervals. As selectionsreach the end of the general selection memory portion 64 or progress inage, the information can be compressed, so that more information can bestored in the general memory portion 64. In other words, the size andthe quality of the item recorded is reduced, based on the reducedlikelihood that the user will watch a show so that the item can still beretained for as long as possible.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block schematic diagram of a local cache system 70in accordance with another aspect of the present invention. The localcache system 70 includes a cache loading system 72 operable to receiveinferences from an inferences system 71, such as recommendation rankedby preference value, and/or direct instructions to record specificprogram titles from a filtering system 75 via a user interface 73. Oncethe cache loading system 72 receives inferences and/or instructions forrecording program selections, the cache loading system 72 requestsprogram information from the remote program source system 77 and storesthis information in a memory system 76 employing a time dependentutility model 74. The memory system 76 can be a hard drive residing on atelevision set top box, a faster memory (e.g., a RAM) or a combinationof a hard drive which transfers information to a faster memory when aprogram is selected.

Based on the time dependent utility model 74, the expected utility ofmaintaining content in the memory system 76 can be determined by theratio of the current utility as a function of the age of the item andthe policy that is active for the particular item. The value of contentstored in the memory system 76 decays based on the class or type ofcontent, in accordance with the time-dependent utility model 74, forexample, utility becomes a function of initial utility, age and contentclass. Thus, the expected value density of content stored in the memorysystem 76 is the ratio of the size of the object and the current utilityof the object as determined by the time-dependent utility model 74.

The memory system 76 includes a first portion or user define cacheportion 80, a second portion or live show selections portion 82 and athird portion or general selections portion 84. The user defined cacheportion 80 stores user selected programs for recording. The live showselections portion 82 contains stored information relating to programsthat are currently in process that a user may want to catch from thebeginning based on previous viewing habits with the current timeinterval. The general selections portion 84 is the portion of memorywhere general programs are recorded based on the likelihood that asystem user would like to watch these programs. The general programs arerecommended by the inference system 71 to record for later viewing of asystem user based on previous viewing habits within the current timeinterval. The user defined cache portion 80 includes selections S1-S3,the live show selections portion 82 includes selections S4-S7 and thegeneral selections portion 84 contains selections S8-S16. The selectionsS1-S16 include programs of various time periods and sizes.

The local cache system 70 includes the time dependent utility model 74,which monitors the memory system 76 through information stored in thecache loading system 72. The time dependent utility model 74 monitorsthe program selection information residing in the memory system 76 andutilizes the expected value density of new and old content to age outthe program selection information residing in the memory system 76. Forexample, the time dependent utility model 74 receives program loadinginformation from the cache loading system 72 and keeps track of theselections and the expected value density of programs in the memorysystem 76. The time dependent utility model 74 periodically reassignsvalues to the program selections. The time dependent utility model 74then transfers this information to the cache loading system 72 whichthen rearranges the programs in the memory system 76 based on the newvalues. The time dependent utility model 74 can include differentpolicies for different classes of programs. Furthermore, the initialdefault time-dependent decay functions for each class can becontinuously refined by observing and logging the likelihood that a userwill observe a recorded show with the amount of time that has passedsince the recording has been made and the show has not yet been watched.

In one aspect of the invention, the available memory in the generalselections portion 84 becomes totally committed. In this event, newlyavailable content overwrites previously stored content when the expectedvalue density of the new content exceeds the expected value density ofolder content. As a programs value is reduced, it eventually becomesaged out by new programs with higher values. For example, after aprogram has resided in memory for a few days, it is highly unlikely thata system user will watch this program. Therefore, the value of theprogram is reduced based on the time dependent utility model 74. Asselections reach the end of the general selection memory portion 84 orprogress in age, the information can be compressed, so that moreinformation can be stored in the general memory portion 84. The size andthe quality of the item recorded can be reduced, based on the reducedlikelihood that the user will watch a show so that the item can still beretained for as long as possible.

FIG. 5 illustrates a block schematic diagram of additional components ofthe multimedia system 90 employed to provide live show selections to asystem user, so that the user may catch shows already in progress. Alocal cache 97 residing in a program delivery system 96 is provided withN number of tuners 102 coupled to a live show selections portion 100 ofa memory system 98. An inference system 92, directly or through afiltering system 94 via a user interface 93, provides the programdelivery system 96 with prediction information on which programs that asystem user will most likely be interested in viewing at any given timeperiod. A cache loading system 104 within the local cache system 97 willbegin recording these programs from the beginning of the show. Once auser selects a program through the user interface 93, the filteringsystem 94 transmits a request to the program delivery system 96. Theprogram delivery system 96 then begins transmitting the program from thelive selections portion 100 of the memory system 98 to a viewer 95. Theremaining portion of the program is recorded from a remote programsource 108 as the beginning portions are transmitted to the viewer 95,so that the user may view the entire program from the beginning to theend. Other programs in the live show selections portion 100 can beremoved from the memory system 98 or overwritten once a selection hasbeen made.

At the end of a programming time period, new programs are recorded andold programs are abandoned or eventually aged out based on a cacheretention policy 106. The selections for the live show selection portion100 can be provided with a very high value during the period of timethat the show is actually live and be quickly aged out after the showends. Therefore, new live show selections are constantly replacing oldlive show selections. It is to be appreciated that the live showselection portion and the general selection portion of the memory system98 can be replaced by a general memory portion employing a quick agingout methodology of live show selections. For example, live showselections can be provided with a very high value in the general memoryportion and quickly aged out after the show ends. In this way, a singlegeneral memory portion may be employed for storing all programinformation.

In one aspect of the invention, live shows are specially treated suchthat shows starting at standard times (e.g., on the hour, on the halfhour) for multiple shows (per multiple tuners, ranked by likelihood thata user will watch the show) are recorded, and the value of these showsare atypically high at the hour or half hour (e.g., standard startingtimes) that the show is running. Additionally, the live shows aredecayed out more quickly given that the shows are being treatedspecially for the purpose of providing a service of “near real time”watching. That is for when users begin viewing, briefly after a show isalready in progress.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a possible user interface 110 thatallows a user to review available selections quickly without undulysearching, for example, via a remote control. A day scroll down menu 112and a time scroll down menu 114 are provided to allow a user to select astart time for providing recommendations of program selections to theuser. A period scroll down menu 116 is also provided that allows a userto select a time period for providing suggested program selections. Theperiod scroll down menu 116 illustrates a few possible selections that auser can select, such as “now” (e.g., live selections), “anytime”, or“next two hours”. Other selections may be provided, such as “next 12hours”, “next day”, “next week”, “2 hours from now”, etc. Once a userhas selected a date and time to start from and a time period, the usercan then select an “Update” button 128. A plurality of recommendationsare then provided to the user in a recommendation window 126. Theselections fall within the time period requested, and are rankedaccording to selections that the user is most likely to be interested inviewing and/or recording (e.g., inferred strength) based on employinginference techniques on historical data for a time interval encompassingthe requested time period.

A second window 124 is provided that includes a reviewed items list. Thereviewed items list includes a plurality of items that have beenreviewed by users of the system. Items that the user has reviewed for athreshold period of time within a time period selected are assigned apositive vote as indicated by a check mark in a box located in apositive vote column. Items that the user has jumped away from afterbeing reviewed briefly within a time period selected are assigned anegative vote as indicated by a check mark in a box located in anegative vote column. The reviewed items list is inputted into theinference system to provide the recommended items in the window 126. Thereviewed items list is editable such that the user can edit or assignpositive and negative votes to an item and select the “Update” button128 to modify the recommended items of interest in the window 126.

A population selection box 118 is provided to allow a user todisable/enable a popularity filter. The popularity filter evaluatesselections that are likely to be of interest to a user that the user ismost likely not to know about. For example, a selection can be assigneda value by multiplying an inference value by the probability that theuser did not know about the selection. If the population selection boxis selected, a plurality of selections that a user does not know about,but may find of interest, is provided in recommendations window 126.Another window 129 provides other suggested links of interest, forexample, that are downloadable for viewing. Additionally, a first searchwindow 120 is provided for allowing a user to enter patterns forupdating the evidence about the kind of show that the user is interestedin reviewing. A second search window 122 is provided for displaying theresults of the pattern search. A user can scan through therecommendations using a remote control or the like and choose to recordthe selection by choosing a “Record” button 125 or choose to view theselection by choosing a “View” button 127.

It is to be appreciated that some multimedia programs are broadcastperiodically that are not live or are available via a request or a link.For these types of broadcasts the present invention is adapted to allowreal-time viewing of the content by storing a portion of the program inlocal memory that is necessary for viewing of the content in itsentirety without interruption due to viewing that occurs faster than thedownloading of the content. The present invention employs methodologiesthat determine the needs to be downloaded, so as to allow time for thecomplement to be downloaded should the system sense the user isreviewing an entire program.

FIG. 7 illustrates a program delivery system 142 that resides on aserver 140 coupled to a set top box 150 of a client via a communicationlink 148. The communication link 148 can be via a hardwire link (e.g., acommunication cable) or a wireless link (e.g., a satellite link). Theprogram delivery system 142 includes an inference system 144 thatreceives general media selections 145 and other media selections 146that are broadcast periodically or available by request (e.g., pay forviewing). The inference system 144 reviews specific viewing history ofusers of the set top box 150, and transmits system specificrecommendations to the set top box 150. Additional system specificinference systems can be provided for each system coupled to the server140. The set top box 150 includes an electronic programming guide system151 comprised of a user interface component 152 coupled to a filteringsystem 154.

The set top box 150 also includes a secondary storage system 156 forstoring portions of selections from the non-live media selection (e.g.,via a link or a request) most likely to be of interest to a system user.The server 140 and the program delivery system 142 are operable tounderstand both the electronic programming guide system 151 andindividual subscriber viewing habits based on selection made at the settop box 150. These selections can be determined by requests made at theset top box 150 or alternatively by transmitting information from theset top box 150 back to the server 140. This information is logged andused to train an inference system 144. The program delivery system 140provides the recommendations to the set top box 150 on what selectionsto log in the secondary storage system 156 based on inferencesdetermined by the inference system 144. The recommendations aredetermined utilizing previous viewing habits of users and the availableselections from the general media selections 145 and the other mediaselection 146.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block schematic diagram of the secondary storagesystem 166 in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. Thesecondary storage system 166 includes a memory loading system 168operable to receive inferences directly from an inference system 160and/or direct instructions to record specific program titles from afiltering system 162 via a user interface 161. Once the memory loadingsystem 168 receives inferences and/or instructions for recording programselections, the memory loading system 168 requests program informationfrom a remote program source system 164 and stores this information in asecondary memory 172. The second memory 172 can be a hard drive residingon a television set top box, a faster memory (e.g., a RAM) or acombination of a hard drive which transfers information to a fastermemory when a program is selected. The secondary storage system 166stores portions of broadcasted programs that a user will most likelywant to view at a specified time period within a time interval for whichthe inference system was trained. The memory loading system 168determines the portion of the program to store based on the transferrate of the program from the remote program source system 164 and theviewing rate of a viewing system 169. The portion of the program is thenstored in the secondary memory 172. In the present example, 60% ofprogram A, 20% of program B and 50% of program C are stored in thesecondary memory 172.

A utility system 170 is coupled to the memory loading system 168. Theutility system 170 employs a cache retention policy component 171 foraging out selection over time. A value assigned to a selectiondynamically changes according to a set of cache retention policies. Forexample, a selection's value may be reduced as the selection agesbecause a user is less likely to view the selection over time.Additionally, the value of a selection changes based on changes on auser's viewing habits, changes in time segments or a user's modificationof the predefined rules or policies. For example, if programs have notbeen viewed for a period of time, the value of the program is reducedand eventually aged out as new programs of higher value are loaded intothe secondary memory 172. Once a user selects a program through the userinterface 161, the program is transmitted from secondary memory 172 tothe viewing system 169. The remaining portion of the program isdownloaded from the remote program source 164 as the beginning portionsare transmitted to the viewer 169, so that the user may view the entireprogram from the beginning to the end without interruptions. Otherprograms in the secondary storage 172 can be removed from the memory oroverwritten once a selection has been made.

In view of the foregoing structural and functional features describedabove, methodologies in accordance with various aspects of the presentinvention will be better appreciated with reference to FIGS. 9-11.While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodology ofFIGS. 9-11 is shown and described as executing serially, it is to beunderstood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited bythe illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with thepresent invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently withother aspects from that shown and described herein. Moreover, not allillustrated features may be required to implement a methodology inaccordance with an aspect the present invention. It is further to beappreciated that the following methodology may be implemented ascomputer-executable instructions, such as software stored in acomputer-readable medium. Alternatively, the methodology may beimplemented as hardware or a combination of hardware and software.

FIG. 9 illustrates one particular methodology for providing arecommendation set to a local storage system employing an inferenceengine in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. At 200,information retrieved by the system is monitored. At 210, retrievedinformation titles are time stamped and logged. The retrievedinformation titles are then assigned a value based on the number oftimes the title has been retrieved utilizing inference techniques. At220, all available information titles for a future time interval areretrieved. At 230, all available titles based on a time period and onpreviously reviewed information for a time interval covering the timeperiod are assigned values and ranked. At 240, the selected titles areprovided in ranked order for the time period requested. The rankedtitles are then transmitted to a local cache system for loading of theranked titles in local memory.

FIG. 10 illustrates one particular methodology for storing informationin a local cache utilizing the value density bin packing method and acache retention policy in accordance with one aspect of the presentinvention. At 260, a sorting value is determined for each title bydetermining the probability that a system user would like to view theinformation divided by the size of the information. At 270, titles arestored in the local cache from the highest sorting value to the lowestsorting value until the local cache is full. At 280, the methodologydetermines if any new titles have been received. If any new titles havenot been received (NO), the method proceeds to 290. At 290, the sortingvalues of the titles are dynamically adjusted based on a set cacheretention policies. The information is then rearranged in the localcache based on the adjusted sorting values of the titles at 300. Themethod then returns to 280.for repeating the step of determining if anynew titles have been received. If any new titles have been received(YES) at 280, the method proceeds to 310. At 310, the sorting values ofthe new titles are determined based on the probability that a systemuser would like to view the information divided by the size of theinformation for each title. At 320, the new and old titles are stored inthe cache from the highest sorting value to the lowest sorting valuewhile titles of the lowest values are aged out of the cache. The methodthen returns to 280 for repeating the step of determining if any newtitles have been received.

FIG. 11 illustrates one particular methodology for providing real timeviewing of programs that are not live and are broadcasted periodicallyfrom a source to a multimedia system in accordance with one aspect ofthe present invention. At 340, other multimedia programs that are notbroadcasted live that are likely to be interesting to a system user aredetermined. At 350, a viewing rate and a transmission rate of eachprogram is determined for N programs. A percentage of each of the Nprograms is stored in a local cache necessary to ensure uninterruptedviewing of a selected program, at 360. At 370, the method determines ifa program has been selected. If a program has not been selected (NO),the programs in the local cache are aged out based on a set of cacheretention policies at 375. Once a program is selected (YES), the methodadvances to 380. At 380, the contents of the selected program aredownloaded from the cache to the viewer. At 390, the remaining portionof the selected program is downloaded to the cache as the program isviewed, until a complete download of the program has occurred.

With reference to FIG. 12, an exemplary system for implementing aportion of the invention includes a conventional personal or servercomputer 420, including a processing unit 421, a system memory 422, anda system bus 423 that couples various system components including thesystem memory to the processing unit 421. The processing unit may be anyof various commercially available processors, including Intel x86,Pentium and compatible microprocessors from Intel and others, includingCyrix, AMD and Nexgen; Alpha from Digital; MIPS from MIPS Technology,NEC, IDT, Siemens, and others; and the PowerPC from IBM and Motorola.Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures also can beused as the processing unit 421.

The system bus may be any of several types of bus structure including amemory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus usingany of a variety of conventional bus architectures such as PCI, VESA,Microchannel, ISA and EISA, to name a few. The system memory includesread only memory (ROM) 424 and random access memory (RAM) 425. A basicinput/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help totransfer information between elements within the computer 420, such asduring start-up, is stored in ROM 424.

The computer 420 further includes a hard disk drive 427, a magnetic diskdrive 428, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 429, and anoptical disk drive 430, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM disk 431 or to readfrom or write to other optical media. The hard disk drive 427, magneticdisk drive 428, and optical disk drive 430 are connected to the systembus 423 by a hard disk drive interface 432, a magnetic disk driveinterface 433, and an optical drive interface 434, respectively. Thedrives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatilestorage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, etc.for the server computer 420. Although the description ofcomputer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removablemagnetic disk and a CD, it should be appreciated by those skilled in theart that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such asmagnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoullicartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operatingenvironment. A number of program modules may be stored in the drives andRAM 425, including an operating system 435, one or more applicationprograms 436, other program modules 437, and program data 438.

A user may enter commands and information into the computer 420 througha keyboard 440 and pointing device, such as a mouse 442. Other inputdevices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad,satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices areoften connected to the processing unit 421 through a serial portinterface 446 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected byother interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port or a universalserial bus (USB). A monitor 447 or other type of display device is alsoconnected to the system bus 423 via an interface, such as a videoadapter 448. In addition to the monitor, computers typically includeother peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers andprinters.

The computer 420 may operate in a networked environment using logicalconnections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote server orclient computer 449. The remote computer 449 may be a workstation, aserver computer, a router, a peer device or other common network node,and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative tothe computer 420, although only a memory storage device 450 has beenillustrated in FIG. 12. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 12include a local area network (LAN) 451 and a wide area network (WAN)452. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices,enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.

When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 420 is connectedto the local network 451 through a network interface or adapter 453.When used in a WAN networking environment, the server computer 420typically includes a modem 454, or is connected to a communicationsserver on the LAN, or has other means for establishing communicationsover the wide area network 452, such as the Internet. The modem 454,which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 423via the serial port interface 446. In a networked environment, programmodules depicted relative to the computer 420, or portions thereof, maybe stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciatedthat the network connections shown are exemplary and other means ofestablishing a communications link between the computers may be used.

In accordance with practices of persons skilled in the art of computerprogramming, the present invention is described below with reference toacts and symbolic representations of operations that are performed bythe computer 420, unless indicated otherwise. Such acts and operationsare sometimes referred to as being computer-executed. It will beappreciated that the acts and symbolically represented operationsinclude the manipulation by the processing unit 421 of electricalsignals representing data bits which causes a resulting transformationor reduction of the electrical signal representation, and themaintenance of data bits at memory locations in the memory system(including the system memory 422, hard drive 427, floppy disks 429, andCD-ROM 431) to thereby reconfigure or otherwise alter the computersystem's operation, as well as other processing of signals. The memorylocations where data bits are maintained are physical locations thathave particular electrical, magnetic, or optical propertiescorresponding to the data bits.

The invention has been described with reference to the preferred aspectsof the invention. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur toothers upon reading and understanding the foregone detailed description.It is intended that the invention be construed as including all suchmodifications alterations, and equivalents thereof.

1. A system that facilitates utilization of local storage space,comprising: a component that logs information relating to historicalaccess of items; an inference component that time segments viewinghabits of household viewers to determine a plurality of probable itemsselections based on a temporal history of media viewing habits in thehousehold, the time segments further including information if an item isviewed on weekdays, weekends, or holidays, the inference componentfurther employs the probable items selections and the logs informationin a utility-based analysis in connection with selectively storing toand deleting items from a local storage space; and a local storage spacecomprising a cache memory comprised that receives the probable itemsselections based on a temporal history from the inference component,begins recording plurality of item selections and upon a user selectingone of the plurality of item selections for viewing during therecording, facilitates downloading recorded portion of the user selectedprogram from the cache memory to a viewer, continues recording remainingportion of the user selection and deletes probable items selections ofthe plurality of the probable items selections not chosen by the userfor viewing.
 2. The system of claim 1, the inference componentdynamically computes changing value densities across a subset of theitems to at least one of: repack, recompress, and replace old items withnew items.
 3. The system of claim 2, the utility analysis considersdecay rates per respective volatility of content relating to the subsetof items.
 4. The system of claim 1, the utility analysis computes alikelihood that an item will be accessed given certain evidence.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, the items comprise media.
 6. The system of claim 1,the items comprise electronic documents.
 7. The system of claim 1, theutility analysis comprising employment of parametric functions to assessvalue of a respective item.
 8. The system of claim 1, further comprisinga statistical model of the probability an item will be accessed.
 9. Thesystem of claim 1, the inference component employs collaborativefiltering techniques on the historical access of items to assign valuesto selections in a recommended list from a higher probability to a lowerprobability that a user will access an item.
 10. A system thatfacilitates memory utilization, comprising: means for storing logginginformation relating to historical access of items; means for appointingrespective values to a subset of the items based on access thereofwherein the values are applied in a value density-based utility analysisin connection with at least one of: replacement, retention, andcompression of the subset of items to a memory; means for determiningprobable items selections based on a temporal history of media viewinghabits in a household, wherein the temporal history of media viewinghabits further including information if an item is viewed on weekdays,weekends, or holidays; and means for selectively storing to and deletingitems from a local storage space comprising a cache memory based uponthe probable items selections and the logging information such that theselective storing begins recording the probable items selectionsautomatically based at least on the temporal history and upon a userselecting one of the item selections being recorded for viewing,downloading the user selection to a viewer and deleting remaining of theitems selections being recorded which are not selected by the user forviewing.
 11. A method that facilitates utilization of local storagespace, comprising: logging information relating to historical access ofitems; determining probable items selections based on a temporal historyof media viewing habits in a household by employing time segmenting to alocal caching system; the time segmenting further including informationif an item is viewed on weekdays, weekends, or holidays, and utilizingthe logging information and probable items selections in a utility-basedanalysis in connection with selectively performing one or more ofcaching to and deleting items from a local storage space such that theprobable items selections are automatically recorded to the localstorage space based at least on the temporal history and upon a userselecting one of the item selections being recorded for viewing, theuser selection is downloaded to a viewer and remaining of the itemselections being recorded which are not selected by the user for viewingare deleted.
 12. The method of claim 11, utilizing an inferencecomponent to dynamically compute changing value densities across asubset of the items to at least one of: repack, recompress, and replaceold items with new items.
 13. The method of claim 11, further comprisingcomputing tenability that an item will be accessed given certainevidence.
 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising scrutinizingdecay rates per respective volatility of content relating to a subset ofitems.
 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising employing at leastone parametric function to assess value of a respective item.
 16. Themethod of claim 11, further comprising utilizing a model of aprobability an item will be accessed.
 17. The method of claim 11, theitems comprise media.
 18. The method of claim 11, employing acollaborative filtering model based on the historical access of items totrain an inference component that performs the selective caching anddeleting of media items from the local storage space.
 19. The system ofclaim 1, the inference component further determining preferences for anyparticular household viewer.
 20. The system of claim 1, wherein multiplemembers of the household are utilizing a single television system or asingle computer.
 21. The system of claim 1, wherein the time segmentingfor a day including early morning, mid-morning, afternoon, lateafternoon, early evening, evening and late night.